Blake Andrews har hittat ett gammalt foto och börjar fundera över relationen mellan ett konstnärligt användande av foto och ett där konstnärligheten kommer in i efterhand:
This particular photo seems to support that idea that the more “artful” a photographer attempts to be –the more referential and self-conscious– the more quickly it is forgotten, while photographers who record reality in less stylized documentary way eventually gain recognition. Some of the greatest photographers of all time –Watkins, Jackson, Atget, Disfarmer, etc– didn’t think of themselves as artists so much as documentary recorders. The recognition as art came later, as artlessness became arty.
In contrast, most of the photos I see in galleries today are done by people trying to make not necessarily photographs but art. Some of them are good, some of them are bad, but the motivation for nearly all is to make art. I suspect that motivation will prove hollow in say 21 years or so.
Läs resten av inlägget här.
Andra bloggar på bloggar.se om:
Atget,
dokumentärfoto,
konstfoto
A lot of artists today use photography, and they create these sort of installations or conceptual photographs. But you remember almost none of those photographs. They just sort of sit there and you have to figure out the guy’s theory to get into the work. The reason the images don’t get inside you is because the artists don’t understand anything about photography. You can’t just set things up and photograph them and expect the picture to “zap.” It is very important that the mind feels that there is a moment of truth or a moment of authenticity. It’s really crucial, because if the artist’s hand is seen as too strong, the pictures seem either dead or contrived. The mind doesn’t believe it. The mind has to see that photograph as commenting on some aspect of truth, whatever truth means.
[…]
The essence of photography is freezing minute periods of time. The mind has to believe that you’ve captured a genuine moment, because that is the purpose of photography. The mind has to believe that the moment can’t be repeated.
En intressant intervju med Roger Ballen på Seesaw magazine.
[via Lens culture.]
Andra bloggar på bloggar.se om:
konstfoto,
roger ballen
aktuella kommentarer